Aishwerya Sharma
Conservation Efforts Gone Bad

This article raises good points about the idea of conserving species through captivity. The idea itself is good: raise animals safely in zoos and when they reproduce enough, let them go free. However, there are many problems with this. First, this article points out, and probably extends on it in another article, that most of the species raised in captivity are never released in the wild. Second, even though these programs encourage “saving the species” they do not address issues at the heart of the problem such as habitat loss.

http://www.bornfreeusa.org/facts.php?p=436&more=1

30 New Diseases…Just for Humans

Conservation Medicine is a multidisciplinary field that is hard to define. It studies many issues relating to human health, wildlife health and ecosystem health. It has gained more popularity in recent years because there has been more than thirty human diseases that have emerged in the last decade. There are also other problems such as the Rift Valley fever and the West Nile virus infection. Fibropapillomatosis is a lesser know disease that affects marine turtles and other coastal sea creatures. “Fibropapillomatosis, a marine turtle disease associated with heavily polluted coastal areas, could be an indicator portending human health problems.”

http://ehp03.niehs.nih.gov/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1289%2Fehp.111-a524
Exemption from BART

On December 23, 2011 the EPA suggested that twenty-eight states be exempt from the BART (Best Available Retrofit Technology) rule. BART is technology that that cleans and controls the air in National Parks from the haze from coal plants. Instead, the EPA wants the states to rely on emission reductions set by the Cross State Air Pollution Rule and this has bothered some critics.
http://www.npca.org/news/reports/cleaning-up-the-haze.html

Ecological Graph

amnhconservationbio:

This scatter plot does a good job displaying the information on ecological footprint because it shows the planets in relation to age. You can look at this graph and tell that most kids around the age 17 have an ecological footprint between 3 and 4.5 planets.

-Aishwerya and Nadia

Climate Change Reduces Biodiversity

The Golden Toad of Costa Rica went extinct suddenly.

Excerpt from TIMES article:

While the impact of climate change on human populations is likely to be dire, we’re pretty good at adapting to change overall. Animals, however, are not. When their habitats change irrevocably — when the rain forest dries up or cool mountains in tropical zones heat up — animals may simply go extinct. A recent study in Science demonstrates how that can happen. Robert Colwell, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Connecticut, analyzed data from nearly 2,000 species of plants, insects and fungi in the tropics, where organisms often lack the ability to escape warming temperatures by going north or south; instead, they have to go up in elevation to find cooler temperatures. Colwell found that as populations in lowland areas move up, they tend not to be replaced. That means that we may see a reduction in overall biodiversity and what scientists call “species richness.” Meanwhile, species that already live at the highest elevations have no place to go, except perhaps to extinction. Case in point: the Golden Toad, which lived in the high-altitude cloud forests of Costa Rica and suddenly went extinct. Its disappearance may be due in part to warming, which made its habitat unlivable.

Read more:

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1849698,00.html#ixzz1us6Bjqpa

My ecological footprint: 3.7 planets.

My ecological footprint: 3.7 planets.

Loose Change.
amnhconservationbio:

 [I]ncreases in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations is very likely to have caused most of the increases in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century.
Greenhouse gasses (GHG) get a bad reputation for being the main cause of our unusual weather patterns. However, without these gases the average temperature would be about 59˚F (33˚C) cooler than usual on any given day. The most abundant greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere are water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and ozone (O3). The problem arises when carbon monoxide is created from carbon fuels not completely burned. This carbon monoxide creates an imbalance in the level of O3 by reacting and eventually destroys the ozone. And that’s what ruins our planet!
-Aishwerya S.
[Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas#Natural_and_anthropogenic_sources]

amnhconservationbio:

 [I]ncreases in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations is very likely to have caused most of the increases in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century.

Greenhouse gasses (GHG) get a bad reputation for being the main cause of our unusual weather patterns. However, without these gases the average temperature would be about 59˚F (33˚C) cooler than usual on any given day. The most abundant greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere are water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and ozone (O3). The problem arises when carbon monoxide is created from carbon fuels not completely burned. This carbon monoxide creates an imbalance in the level of O3 by reacting and eventually destroys the ozone. And that’s what ruins our planet!

-Aishwerya S.

[Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas#Natural_and_anthropogenic_sources]

The Saola Endangered!

amnhconservationbio:

http://www.worldwildlife.org/species/finder/saola/saola.html

With its unusually long horns and white markings on the face, the saola is a strong symbol for biodiversity in Lao and Vietnam. Discovered in May 1992, during a joint survey carried out by the Ministry of Forestry of Vietnam and WWF in north-central Vietnam, the species remains almost as elusive today as it was more than a decade ago.

-Nadia & Aishwerya 

Candidate Species

I had a hard time making good graphs in Google Docs using the way the information was presented, so I copied and pasted the two columns that I wanted to look at in Excel and made bar graphs. Google Docs would only allow me to make line graphs, which I thought were not appropriate for the information because we are not showing a continuation. The data is showing distinct values for each species in certain states. Excel allowed me to create the graphs above. The top one represents candidate species in Kentucky and the bottom one represents candidate species in Washington. Looking at the two graphs, we can see that we have more candidate species for Kentucky than Washington and we can see that the species in Kentucky generally have higher LPN values than those in Washington, which means that the animals in Washington are of more concern.

-Aishwerya S.